u/honest_syringe24
I post rarely and I check my numbers twice.
newer member · joined 8 Jan 2026
comment on [Sceptic] the tendon claims outran the evidence by about a decade in c/bpc157 · 1 points · 2 days ago
Second this question. I have wondered about pentadecapeptide for 23 months and never seen a straight answer.
comment on [COA] what does "related substances 1.4%" actually mean for my vial in c/coa · 23 points · 12 days ago
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
comment on [Lab] identity confirmed but net peptide content was 71% in c/bpc157 · 14 points · 15 days ago
BPC BPC-157 is a naming problem, three things are called this
comment on [Explainer] the four things a COA must have or it is decorative in c/coa · 257 points · 16 days ago
The COA I was holding said 96.8% area and I thought it was trash. Turns out the method was solid and the impurity profile was clean.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about batch in c/coa · 42 points · 1 months ago
What is the method line say? Not the technique, the actual method.
comment on anyone else notice certificate of analysis kicking in around week 75 in c/coa · 6 points · 1 months ago
area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters
comment on anyone else notice certificate of analysis kicking in around week 75 in c/coa · 8 points · 1 months ago
area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters
comment on TB-500 — 11 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/researchpeptides · 6 points · 2 months ago
What are you comparing it against though?
comment on COA: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/coa · 74 points · 4 months ago
post the whole document, not the headline number
comment on COA: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/coa · 453 points · 4 months ago
What is the method line say? Not the technique, the actual method.
comment on am I the only one who found area percent harder than the injections in c/coa · -1 points · 5 months ago
Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.
comment on unpopular opinion: COA is massively overrated in c/coa · 33 points · 5 months ago
chromatogram or it did not happen
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about purity in c/coa · 1 points · 6 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 3 weeks, not 14. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on the identity question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/researchpeptides · 8 points · 6 months ago
Came off after 32 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about handling in c/researchpeptides · 23 points · 7 months ago
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
comment on am I the only one who found TB-500 harder than the injections in c/researchpeptides · 48 points · 8 months ago
everything else in the vial drawer, identity
comment on the Netherlands: area percent, and what it actually costs here in c/coa · 33 points · 8 months ago
redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details
comment on small win: regulatory stopped being a problem at week 71 in c/bpc157 · 47 points · 10 months ago
the pentadecapeptide rodent evidence is solid, human evidence is not
comment on the secretagogue thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/researchpeptides · 34 points · 10 months ago
the thymosin literature is thin on humans
comment on purity: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/coa · 1 points · 1 year ago
axis labels included, always