u/ilias_steiner
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Rennes.
member · joined 14 May 2025
Comments — page 2 of 4
comment on reading UK threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/glp1uk · 4 points · 4 months ago
MHRA supply notices change monthly, follow the actual list
comment on [Question] mg/mL — what am I missing here in c/reconstitution · 55 points · 4 months ago
show your working or it is unhelpful
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Question] excursion — what am I missing here in c/coldchain · 4 points · 5 months ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with lyophilised, not with what you concluded.
comment on [Lab] SSA cagri — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 98.3% in c/glp1eu · 8 points · 6 months ago
reimbursement costs in New Zealand this month
comment on [Lab] SSA cagri — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 98.3% in c/glp1eu · 13 points · 6 months ago
Apotheke or receta or what?
comment on is it normal to get the food-noise thing at week 50 in c/glp1women · -25 points · 6 months ago
hair-loss on contraception is real
comment on small win: regulatory stopped being a problem at week 96 in c/bpc157 · 17 points · 6 months ago
rodent data must be labelled as rodent data
comment on data logger: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/coldchain · 61 points · 7 months ago
This is correct. Dry powder is way more robust than liquid.
comment on why does nobody talk about tier 3 in c/glp1uk · 8 points · 7 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 18 weeks, not 26. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on three years of prescription threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/glp1eu · 4 points · 8 months ago
EMA and national agency claims need citation
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 26 weeks to accept.
comment on small win: fertility stopped being a problem at week 55 in c/glp1women · 6 points · 8 months ago
no cycle-tracking data with identifying details
comment on three years of dead space threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/reconstitution · 1 points · 8 months ago
Yeah, showing the arithmetic is the fastest way for someone to spot the error.
comment on three years of dead space threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/reconstitution · 17 points · 8 months ago
show your working or it is unhelpful
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on three years of dead space threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/reconstitution · 47 points · 8 months ago
show your working or it is unhelpful
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify reconstitution in c/reconstitution · 62 points · 9 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on am I the only one who found rodent data harder than the injections in c/bpc157 · 41 points · 9 months ago
pentadecapeptide is tendon, the supply chain naming is a mess
comment on three years of data logger threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/coldchain · 53 points · 10 months ago
Reconstituted or dry powder?
comment on [PSA] Apotheke is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/glp1eu · 4 points · 1 year ago
Small correction: the trial was 16 weeks, not 21.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 63 weeks to accept.
comment on [PSA] bacteriostatic water is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/reconstitution · 58 points · 1 year ago
never post a calculation as advice without stating the concentration
comment on [Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on insulin resistance in c/glp1women · 7 points · 1 year ago
hair-loss on PCOS is real