u/laila_yilmaz
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Medellín.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
Overview — page 4 of 5
comment on PDF metadata — my 24-week log, condensed into one table in c/scamalerts · -18 points · 7 months ago
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
comment on COA vs purity — genuinely asking which matters more in c/coa · -35 points · 8 months ago
Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.
comment on the normal thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/newbiequestions · 89 points · 9 months ago
comment on small win: PDF metadata stopped being a problem at week 40 in c/scamalerts · 219 points · 9 months ago
reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations
comment on [Discussion] the related substances advice in here is 9 years out of date in c/coa · 277 points · 9 months ago
comment on [Meta] the eGFR rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/bloodwork · 4 points · 9 months ago
Is that fasted?
comment on [Lab] SGN survo — VendorInvestigate came back 99.0% against a claimed 99.1% in c/survodutide · 14 points · 9 months ago
the MASH indication changes the risk calculus
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 97.9% on the same vial is normal.
comment on genuine question about scam that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/scamalerts · 74 points · 10 months ago
Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify SURPASS in c/tirzepatide · 176 points · 11 months ago
week 48 on Mounjaro and the appetite profile is genuinely different from sema
comment on why does nobody talk about SURPASS in c/tirzepatide · 138 points · 11 months ago
stalled on sema, tried tirz, and the curves were actually different shapes
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about basics until somebody posts a number in c/newbiequestions · 14 points · 11 months ago
rudeness is removed faster than bad questions
comment on [Discussion] the purity advice in here is 9 years out of date in c/coa · 12 points · 1 year ago
The COA I was holding said 96.8% area and I thought it was trash.
Adding to this: batch is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on [PSA] COA is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/coa · 201 points · 1 year ago
post the whole document, not the headline number
comment on small win: normal stopped being a problem at week 26 in c/newbiequestions · 23 points · 1 year ago
what is titration — it means going slow on the escalation
comment on tried A1c for 9 weeks. here is what happened. in c/bloodwork · -1 points · 1 year ago
ALT is where the fatty-liver story shows up first
comment on [Question] Mounjaro — what am I missing here in c/tirzepatide · 2 points · 1 year ago
Zepbound and Mounjaro are literally the same drug, the name is the only difference
comment on 6 months in and glucagon is still the thing I get wrong in c/survodutide · 3 points · 1 year ago
Which trial arm?
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for ferritin posts in c/bloodwork · 5 points · 1 year ago
redact identifying details from lab PDFs before posting
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for ferritin posts in c/bloodwork · -22 points · 1 year ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring area percent at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/coa · 1 points · 1 year ago
post the whole document, not the headline number