u/laila_yilmaz

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points.

Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.

the batch number or it did not happen

Strongly agree. No question is dumb here.

Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.

the reship offer that never sends anything is worth noting

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

MASH claims need the trial and the biopsy endpoint

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

Strongly agree. No question is dumb here.

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

the nausea from tirz is different, not necessarily worse

the related substances line is where the story is

Same lab both times?

The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.