8 months in and group buy is still the thing I get wrong
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: PDF metadata matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 7 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 9 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
evidence required, dated screenshots, metadata, order records, or independent test
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
the QSC situation resolved, logged it here as resolved
fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
the batch number appearing across three vendors is a red flag
- 1The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.7 comments in this branch · started by u/ferran_batista