GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of 8 months in and group buy is still the thing I get wrong — 9 comments in the full submission. View in context.
161
c/scamalerts·submitted 1 year ago by u/isabela_nilsen

8 months in and group buy is still the thing I get wrong

Unverifiedbranch of 7 comments

Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: PDF metadata matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 7 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 9 people measuring the…

Read the full submission and all 9 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 1 year ago
u/ferran_batista21 points·1 year ago

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.

replysharereportpermalink
u/valeria_karlsen24 points·1 year ago

evidence required, dated screenshots, metadata, order records, or independent test

replysharereportpermalink
u/rasmus_kuipers7 points·1 year ago

PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds

replysharereportpermalink
u/isabela_nilsenOP4 points·1 year ago

the QSC situation resolved, logged it here as resolved

replysharereportpermalink
u/isabela_nilsenOP2 points·1 year ago

fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance

replysharereportpermalink
u/laila_yilmaz11 points·1 year ago·edited

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tuva_aalto9 points·1 year ago

Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/scamalerts
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/scam_taxonomyu/coa_forgery_watchu/whois_wandau/sock_puppet_spotter
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →