u/line_demir
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Hyderabad.
member · joined 11 Feb 2025
Comments — page 2 of 4
comment on someone explain identity to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/researchpeptides · 1 points · 3 months ago
everything else in the vial drawer, identity
Adding to this: TB-500 is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on [Meta] the FLOW rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/trialwatch · 6 points · 4 months ago
Crossposting this to c/coa because the people who need it are not reading this community.
comment on struggle: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/progresspics · 45 points · 4 months ago
non-scale victories count, post them
comment on someone explain shipping to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/intlshipping · 83 points · 5 months ago
customs clearance often adds 4 days, factor that in
comment on genuine question about hazard ratio that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/trialwatch · 44 points · 6 months ago
off-label use data is different from approved-indication data
comment on lane: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/intlshipping · 56 points · 6 months ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on is it normal to get the food-noise thing at week 20 in c/glp1muscle · 1 points · 6 months ago
Slight fix: the number was 95.1, not 94.2.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about handling in c/researchpeptides · 53 points · 7 months ago
Yeah, identity is the first question.
comment on my hs-CRP moved and I cannot work out whether FLOW is why in c/trialwatch · 34 points · 7 months ago
the 18 week readout is different from the 27 week readout
comment on my hs-CRP moved and I cannot work out whether FLOW is why in c/trialwatch · 180 points · 7 months ago
Strongly agree. Phase 2 is investigational, not conclusive.
comment on reading SURPASS threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/trialwatch · 3 points · 8 months ago
Phase 2 or phase 3?
comment on [Results] 81 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/trialwatch · 56 points · 8 months ago
the discontinuation arms are the interesting part, not the endpoint endpoints
comment on switched from 1.7mg to 1.0mg and the nausea got better, not worse in c/intlshipping · 51 points · 9 months ago
Denmark to Denmark: QYB with 4 days is the average, variance is 15
comment on [Results] 82 weeks, 15kg, and progress was the hard part in c/progresspics · 32 points · 9 months ago
This is correct.
Disagree on that part. 99.2% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Meta] the FFMI rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/glp1muscle · 10 points · 10 months ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on help me understand endpoint, I have read the wiki twice in c/trialwatch · 17 points · 12 months ago
absolute risk reduction, not relative risk reduction, that is how you decide
comment on reading identity threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/researchpeptides · 16 points · 1 year ago
thymosin fragments, GH secretagogues, TB-500, long tail
comment on [Discussion] the research peptides advice in here is 5 years out of date in c/researchpeptides · 0 points · 1 year ago
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.
comment on [Question] timeframe — what am I missing here in c/progresspics · 43 points · 1 year ago
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
comment on help me understand progress, I have read the wiki twice in c/progresspics · 61 points · 1 year ago
text removes the comparison trap