846
someone explain exit scam to me like I have not read a paper in years
Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/reconstitution repeats that exit scam is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I…
u/mei_cardoso
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Breda.
member · joined 12 Mar 2025
6,884post karma
7,837comment karma
6submissions
104comments
Overview — page 2 of 5
comment on [Discussion] the below spec advice in here is 15 years out of date in c/labresults · 155 points · 2 months ago
Strongly agree. Below-spec results matter as much as good ones.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about pricing in c/glp1uk · 2 points · 2 months ago
[deleted]
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 97.4% on the same vial is normal.
comment on UK — my 16-week log, condensed into one table in c/glp1uk · 157 points · 2 months ago
This is correct. Private and NHS pathways are different.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for log posts in c/dosinglogs · 1 points · 3 months ago
logs that stop 3 days get Concluded flair automatically
comment on Medutest — 2 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/labresults · 210 points · 3 months ago
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
comment on the MHRA question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/glp1uk · 0 points · 3 months ago
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
comment on [Question] regret — what am I missing here in c/darkspot · 0 points · 3 months ago
Genuine question — what concentration were you at?
comment on [Question] regret — what am I missing here in c/darkspot · 9 points · 3 months ago
tests that came back 97.4%
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about private plan until somebody posts a number in c/glp1canada · 16 points · 3 months ago
Has anyone actually got this in writing, or is it forum lore at this point?
comment on help me understand fake COA, I have read the wiki twice in c/scamalerts · 31 points · 3 months ago
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on am I the only one who found test results harder than the injections in c/labresults · 14 points · 3 months ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about what went wrong in c/darkspot · -37 points · 4 months ago
money lost to group buys
comment on [PSA] tier 3 is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/glp1uk · 1 points · 4 months ago
NHS tier 3 is pricing, the waiting list is real
comment on someone explain exit scam to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/scamalerts · 2 points · 4 months ago
PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page. Worth flagging.
comment on someone explain exit scam to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/scamalerts · 19 points · 4 months ago
The cloned ERP store used our old homepage image from 2023. Reverse image search caught it in 21 seconds.
comment on [Discussion] regret is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/darkspot · 125 points · 4 months ago
the lesson is the point
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on below spec — 5 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/darkspot · 47 points · 5 months ago
Second this question.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on is it normal to get the food-noise thing at week 50 in c/glp1women · 57 points · 6 months ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on help me understand exit scam, I have read the wiki twice in c/scamalerts · -21 points · 6 months ago
i do not know. that is the honest answer.