u/noor_cardoso
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Ibadan.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
Comments — page 2 of 5
comment on someone explain PeptideMeter to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/vendorvetting · 6 points · 1 months ago
Reship experience: HJ asked for photos, processed it in 19 days, sent a replacement no questions. That is the template.
comment on someone explain PeptideMeter to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/vendorvetting · 4 points · 1 months ago
Did you test the vial you received or are we going off the vendor COA?
comment on [Question] Sweden — has anyone got a straight answer on order records in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 2 months ago
Batch number? Date? Method? Give us the load-bearing fields.
comment on anyone else notice wiki kicking in around week 64 in c/meta · 1 points · 2 months ago
sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly
comment on am I the only one who found below spec harder than the injections in c/labresults · 4 points · 2 months ago
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
comment on testing is the most under-discussed thing in c/bloodwork in c/vendorvetting · 23 points · 2 months ago
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
comment on VendorInvestigate: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/vendorvetting · 21 points · 3 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 21 weeks, not 12. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on tried lyophilised for 3 weeks. here is what happened. in c/coldchain · 12 points · 3 months ago
time-at-temperature integral is the dose, not just peak temperature
comment on tried lyophilised for 3 weeks. here is what happened. in c/coldchain · 61 points · 3 months ago
a warm courier van is a bigger problem for a mixed vial than for dry powder
comment on three years of packaging threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/coldchain · 450 points · 4 months ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on switched from 5mg to 2.5mg and the nausea got better, not worse in c/maintenancephase · 1 points · 4 months ago
nobody posts about this part and it is the longest part
comment on ApoB: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/bloodwork · 7 points · 4 months ago
eGFR noise during rapid loss is expected
comment on ALT: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/bloodwork · -20 points · 4 months ago
Retitled to remove editorialising.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 41 weeks to accept.
comment on ALT: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/bloodwork · 0 points · 4 months ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on small win: batch stopped being a problem at week 6 in c/coa · 1 points · 4 months ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on 5 months in and Medutest is still the thing I get wrong in c/vendorvetting · 54 points · 5 months ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on batch vs test results — genuinely asking which matters more in c/labresults · 5 points · 5 months ago
MKM / BPC / batch 9 / PeptideMeter / 96.2% — that is the shape
comment on nobody warned me about nausea and I would have liked the warning in c/coa · 202 points · 5 months ago
the batch number or it did not happen
comment on switched from 12.5mg to 10mg and the constipation got better, not worse in c/labresults · 57 points · 5 months ago
JEEP claimed 96.2%, Janoshik came back 94.2%. 15 points is inter-lab variance, no drama.
comment on switched from 12.5mg to 10mg and the constipation got better, not worse in c/labresults · 110 points · 5 months ago
ERP claimed 99.2%, Medutest came back 99.0%. 2 points is inter-lab variance, no drama.