u/nz_unfunded

Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.

The dual agonism story is real. The appetite is physically different from semaglutide alone.

Vial-splitting is on-topic here. Do not ask about pen-cracking, that goes in c/reconstitution.

Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.

Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.

Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.

PBS/TGA claims need the notice or schedule entry

The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.

the appetite change on tirz is more than just reduced hunger, it is different machinery

Order date, product, and result, in that order please?

CPC order #21, Spain, no drama, receipts inside

Small correction: the trial was 14 weeks, not 24. Does not change your point but people will quote it.

order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.

Strongly agree. AU and NZ differ.

Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.

Week 59 on Mounjaro and 39kg down. The appetite reduction feels different from sema in ways I do not have words for yet.

tendon and CagriSema literature in rodents is interesting

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.