u/pavel_nkemelu
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Cork.
member · joined 14 May 2025
Comments — page 5 of 5
comment on why does nobody talk about lipids in c/bloodwork · 2 points · 1 year ago
ferritin tanks quietly on a reduced appetite, check it
comment on help me understand ferritin, I have read the wiki twice in c/bloodwork · 18 points · 1 year ago
HOMA-IR is crude but free and useful for tracking
comment on help me understand ferritin, I have read the wiki twice in c/bloodwork · 1 points · 1 year ago
Not to be pedantic but ALT and A1c are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on help me understand ferritin, I have read the wiki twice in c/bloodwork · 1 points · 1 year ago
Baseline fasting insulin: 97.9. Week 29: 97.4. Same lab, fasted, same time of day. Trend matters.
comment on help me understand ferritin, I have read the wiki twice in c/bloodwork · -14 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. ApoB is the better marker.
comment on genuine question about external review that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/insurancefights · 23 points · 2 years ago
prior auth criteria are state-specific, prior authorization differs
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 40 weeks to accept.
comment on anyone else notice exit scam kicking in around week 75 in c/scamalerts · 291 points · 2 years ago
The WXT exit scam collected 19 orders and disappeared. Order ids 34 through 19 all silent.
comment on anyone else notice exit scam kicking in around week 75 in c/scamalerts · 1 points · 2 years ago
PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page. Worth flagging.
comment on anyone else notice exit scam kicking in around week 75 in c/scamalerts · 79 points · 2 years ago
PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page. Worth flagging.
comment on fraud: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/scamalerts · 13 points · 2 years ago
Small correction: the trial was 11 weeks, not 4. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on fraud: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/scamalerts · 15 points · 2 years ago
PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page. Worth flagging.
comment on fraud: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/scamalerts · 27 points · 2 years ago
Dated screenshot or is this from memory?
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about cloned site in c/scamalerts · 15 points · 2 years ago
Dated screenshot or is this from memory?
comment on plateau vs titration — genuinely asking which matters more in c/semaglutide · 79 points · 2 years ago
[removed by moderator]
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 86 weeks to accept.
comment on denial: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/insurancefights · 46 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, the denial code matters, it tells you what to fight.
comment on small win: step therapy stopped being a problem at week 35 in c/insurancefights · 11 points · 2 years ago
redact member ids and group numbers from every screenshot
comment on step therapy — 16 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/insurancefights · -18 points · 2 years ago
This is correct. Appeal letters work.