u/piotr_grimaldi
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Lagos.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
Comments — page 3 of 5
comment on [Question] TB-500 — what am I missing here in c/researchpeptides · 0 points · 6 months ago
name the compound precisely, TB-500 and Thymosin Beta-4 are not the same
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about handling in c/researchpeptides · 153 points · 7 months ago
What was the batch number and which service?
comment on pharmacology — 17 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/glp1science · 9 points · 7 months ago
This is correct. Rodent data is investigational, not predictive.
comment on pharmacology — 17 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/glp1science · 6 points · 7 months ago
do not extrapolate rodent data to human dosing without saying so
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring waist at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/dosinglogs · 2 points · 7 months ago
How many weeks between the two measurements?
comment on small win: TB-500 stopped being a problem at week 21 in c/researchpeptides · 15 points · 7 months ago
supply-chain naming is a mess, ask for HPLC
comment on small win: TB-500 stopped being a problem at week 21 in c/researchpeptides · 48 points · 7 months ago
Yeah, identity is the first question.
comment on [Discussion] goal weight is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/maintenancephase · 150 points · 7 months ago
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
comment on am I the only one who found TB-500 harder than the injections in c/researchpeptides · 106 points · 8 months ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on am I the only one who found TB-500 harder than the injections in c/researchpeptides · 60 points · 8 months ago
the 9-letter analogs are speculative
comment on switched from 10mg to 7.5mg and the sulphur burps got better, not worse in c/maintenancephase · 2 points · 8 months ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with dose stretching, not with what you concluded.
comment on [Results] 96 weeks on 0.25mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/newbiequestions · 9 points · 8 months ago
Pens or research vials?
comment on [Discussion] pentadecapeptide is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/bpc157 · 65 points · 9 months ago
regulatory status changed in 5 countries, check yours
comment on beginner — my 23-week log, condensed into one table in c/newbiequestions · 240 points · 9 months ago
link the wiki instead of retyping, but politely
comment on [Results] 87 weeks, 25kg, and receptor was the hard part in c/glp1science · 8 points · 9 months ago
the half-life is half-life, affects steady state timing
comment on small win: regulatory stopped being a problem at week 71 in c/bpc157 · 1 points · 10 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on anyone else notice BPC-157 kicking in around week 54 in c/bpc157 · 4 points · 10 months ago
This is correct. The naming is genuinely confusing.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify lowest effective dose in c/maintenancephase · 83 points · 10 months ago
Maintenance for 10 months now. 0.25mg every 15 days, weight 22±10kg. Found the rhythm.
comment on week 6 check-in — 36kg down, sulphur burps manageable, one thing confusing me in c/dosinglogs · 16 points · 10 months ago
dose, date, weight, waist, muscle cramps, labs
comment on what is: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/newbiequestions · 27 points · 11 months ago
what is bac water — bacteriostatic water, preservative included