u/priya_palacios
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Zadar.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
Comments — page 4 of 5
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify area percent in c/coa · 0 points · 11 months ago
axis labels included, always
comment on telehealth is the most under-discussed thing in c/progresspics in c/compounding · 4 points · 11 months ago
This is correct. The shortage list does expire and the rules change.
comment on telehealth is the most under-discussed thing in c/progresspics in c/compounding · 17 points · 11 months ago
the the UK situation is different from the US, different regulations
comment on telehealth is the most under-discussed thing in c/progresspics in c/compounding · 56 points · 11 months ago
Did they tell you their API source or dodge the question?
comment on [PSA] Apotheke is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/glp1eu · 14 points · 1 year ago
Small correction: the trial was 16 weeks, not 21. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on genuine question about what went wrong that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/darkspot · 87 points · 1 year ago
side effects that ended someone's run
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for shipping posts in c/intlshipping · 171 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. Variance is the story.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for shipping posts in c/intlshipping · -38 points · 1 year ago
packaging quality matters on the 20-hour segments
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring area percent at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/coa · 1 points · 1 year ago
Sceptical.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on scam: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/scamalerts · 243 points · 1 year ago
the QYB situation resolved, logged it here as resolved
comment on anyone else notice lost money kicking in around week 95 in c/darkspot · 40 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. Evidence still required.
comment on is it normal to get sulphur burps at week 90 in c/glp1eu · 11 points · 1 year ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about compounding until somebody posts a number in c/compounding · 1 points · 1 year ago
Asked 24 compounders about API source. One told me, one dodged, one said they cannot say. The answer is the signal.
comment on 14 months in and fake COA is still the thing I get wrong in c/scamalerts · 48 points · 1 year ago
cloned storefronts use old images, search for those
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about area percent in c/coa · 54 points · 1 year ago
Metadata check caught a COA that was created in a browser four months after the analysis date. Not evidence of fraud, but worth flagging to Homopeptide.
comment on batch vs related substances — genuinely asking which matters more in c/coa · 41 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Mass% and area% are answering different questions on the same document.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about compounding in c/compounding · 3 points · 1 year ago
the 503A/503B distinction is load-bearing, do not blur it
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on genuine question about purity that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/coa · 1 points · 1 year ago
chromatogram or it did not happen
comment on three years of 503A threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/compounding · 24 points · 1 year ago
API transparency is the question that separates good compounders from sketchy ones
comment on [Meta] the reship rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/intlshipping · 8 points · 1 year ago
the community lane table lives here