u/rt_shift_reggie
Retention time shifted 0.4 min and nobody wants to talk about it.
member · joined 19 Mar 2025
Comments — page 3 of 5
comment on stalled for 5 weeks at 0.25mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/newbiequestions · 69 points · 6 months ago
Yeah, that is totally normal for week 5.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring EU at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/glp1eu · 21 points · 7 months ago
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
comment on my hs-CRP moved and I cannot work out whether FLOW is why in c/trialwatch · 25 points · 7 months ago
press release hazard ratio posts must be flaired until a publication exists
comment on help me understand first time, I have read the wiki twice in c/newbiequestions · 106 points · 7 months ago
Crossposting this to c/meta because the people who need it are not reading this community.
comment on three years of week one threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/newbiequestions · 48 points · 7 months ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on reading SURPASS threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/trialwatch · 28 points · 8 months ago
Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 17–5.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 45 weeks to accept.
comment on reading SURPASS threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/trialwatch · -14 points · 8 months ago
SELECT reported a SURMOUNT hazard ratio but the absolute event rate is what changes clinical practice.
comment on reading SURPASS threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/trialwatch · 55 points · 8 months ago
comment on reading SURPASS threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/trialwatch · 20 points · 8 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify prescription in c/glp1eu · 94 points · 8 months ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on [Results] 96 weeks on 0.25mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/newbiequestions · 20 points · 8 months ago
link the wiki instead of retyping, but politely
comment on what is: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/newbiequestions · 23 points · 11 months ago
link the wiki instead of retyping, but politely
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 74 weeks to accept.
comment on week 21 check-in — 27kg down, sulphur burps manageable, one thing confusing me in c/glp1eu · 47 points · 12 months ago
Strongly agree. Pricing is local.
comment on does MHRA actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/glp1uk · -37 points · 1 year ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on [Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on what is in c/newbiequestions · 60 points · 1 year ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on [Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on what is in c/newbiequestions · 1 points · 1 year ago
link the wiki instead of retyping, but politely
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 56 weeks to accept.
comment on [Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on what is in c/newbiequestions · 141 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, that is totally normal for week 11.
comment on 18 months in and private prescription is still the thing I get wrong in c/glp1uk · 432 points · 1 year ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on small win: normal stopped being a problem at week 25 in c/newbiequestions · 3 points · 1 year ago
Week 3 checking in: nothing on the scale, no nausea, wondering if the pen is broken. No, it is just week 3.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about hazard ratio in c/trialwatch · 108 points · 1 year ago
the discontinuation arms are the interesting part, not the STEP endpoints