1.2k
genuine question about scam that I am slightly embarrassed to ask
Right, the exit scam question again, but with numbers this time. I have 8 data points over 16 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance,…
u/santiago_rasmussen
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Kristiansand.
member · joined 10 Jan 2025
3,420post karma
6,569comment karma
6submissions
106comments
Overview — page 3 of 5
comment on am I the only one who found baseline labs harder than the injections in c/bloodwork · 6 points · 5 months ago
ApoB over LDL-C, that is the hierarchy
comment on PDF metadata: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/scamalerts · 10 points · 6 months ago
The Medutest results I got back showed 97.4% but GL Biochem claimed 96.8%. Same vial, two services. I posted the receipts.
comment on three years of test results threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/labresults · 18 points · 6 months ago
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
comment on am I the only one who found reimbursement harder than the injections in c/glp1eu · 5 points · 6 months ago
Not to be pedantic but Apotheke and EMA are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on [Question] 503B — what am I missing here in c/compounding · 51 points · 7 months ago
Are we talking 503A or 503B?
comment on [Results] 46 weeks on 10mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/labresults · 1 points · 7 months ago
reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result
comment on reading A1c threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/bloodwork · 1 points · 7 months ago
nobody here can tell you what a result means for you
comment on three years of Medutest threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/labresults · 11 points · 7 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on [Results] 47 weeks, 46kg, and identity was the hard part in c/researchpeptides · 12 points · 8 months ago
the identity literature is thin on humans
comment on am I the only one who found TB-500 harder than the injections in c/researchpeptides · 20 points · 8 months ago
research use only, handling and analysis, not administration
comment on am I the only one who found TB-500 harder than the injections in c/researchpeptides · -20 points · 8 months ago
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.
comment on [Discussion] the T2D advice in here is 19 years out of date in c/t2dglp1 · 14 points · 8 months ago
Second this question. I have wondered about hypoglycaemia for 4 months and never seen a straight answer.
comment on [PSA] receptor is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/glp1science · -29 points · 8 months ago
incretin physiology is mechanism, the mechanism layer
comment on PeptideMeter vs batch — genuinely asking which matters more in c/labresults · 378 points · 8 months ago
Strongly agree.
Adding to this: below spec is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring pharmacy at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/glp1eu · 5 points · 9 months ago
apotheke, receta, pharmacy — twenty-seven different answers
Adding to this: Apotheke is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on small win: PDF metadata stopped being a problem at week 40 in c/scamalerts · 0 points · 9 months ago
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
comment on genuine question about scam that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/scamalerts · 77 points · 10 months ago
The BCH exit scam collected 10 orders and disappeared. Order ids 28 through 10 all silent.
comment on the secretagogue thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/researchpeptides · 0 points · 10 months ago
Came off after 5 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about mechanism until somebody posts a number in c/glp1science · 31 points · 10 months ago
This is correct. Rodent data is investigational, not predictive.