three years of Medutest threads, summarised so you do not have to read them
Right, the Medutest question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 19 data points over 26 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 4, not week 53. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 11–5. Practical consequence: what you feel in week 1 is not what that dose does.
I am going to push back on this slightly.
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
Slight fix: the number was 95.1, not 94.2. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
the 98.1% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
sample of one, say so
sample of one, say so
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 11 weeks to accept.
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
Yeah, the VendorInvestigate number matching the claim is the actual signal.
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
the 97.4% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal
Not to be pedantic but below spec and purity are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
the VendorInvestigate and VendorInvestigate results differ by 17 points, both inside inter-lab variance
the 97.4% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
KP / BPC / batch 2 / Medutest / 98.1% — that is the shape
Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 3–5. Practical consequence: what you feel in week 1 is not what that dose does.
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
Yeah, the VendorInvestigate number matching the claim is the actual signal.
- 1sample of one, say so11 comments in this branch · started by u/endotoxin_ellie
- 2Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be…4 comments in this branch · started by u/arne_restrepo