three years of Medutest threads, summarised so you do not have to read them
Right, the Medutest question again, but with numbers this time. I have 19 data points over 26 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign. The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am…
sample of one, say so
sample of one, say so
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 11 weeks to accept.
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
Yeah, the VendorInvestigate number matching the claim is the actual signal.
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
the 97.4% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal
Not to be pedantic but below spec and purity are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
the VendorInvestigate and VendorInvestigate results differ by 17 points, both inside inter-lab variance