u/soren_zamora

no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are

redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details

Asked WXT for the batch-specific COA and they sent it within six hours, full document, batch number, date, everything. That is the baseline.

Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 98.9. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

Did you test the vial you received or are we going off the vendor COA?

Adding to this: PeptideMeter is doing more work than the comment implies.

text only is the whole point of the community

dosing errors come from people reconstituting two vials differently and forgetting which is which

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 38 weeks to accept.

Is that 30mg vial or 12mg?

Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with non-scale victory, not with what you concluded.

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.

This is the correct framing. The COA structure matters as much as the number.

never post a calculation as advice without stating the concentration

no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are

Did anything else change in the same window?

Cosigning. The concentration on the vial in marker is load-bearing.

GL Biochem three times. First two perfect, third arrived with a gel pack failure. Powder tested 95.1% anyway, so no harm done.

positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard

Ordered from JEEP, got the vial, tested it myself via VendorInvestigate, and it held the claim. Order fulfilled.

receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule