[Lab] SGN BPC — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 94.2%
Genuinely asking, not being difficult.
Everyone in c/scamalerts repeats that COA is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 12 threads of people agreeing with each other.
Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true because it has been repeated since 2023?
I am not trying to be the "source?" guy. I would just like a source.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 6–5. Practical consequence: what you feel in week 1 is not what that dose does.
no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are
Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 6–5.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
axis labels included, always
Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.
no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are
Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.
Asked WXT for the batch-specific COA and they sent it within six hours, full document, batch number, date, everything. That is the baseline.
the related substances line is where the story is
redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details
area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters
redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details
redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details
Disagree on that part. 98.4% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
purity and net content are two different numbers, same vial
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
the counterion is part of the mass you paid for
purity and net content are two different numbers, same vial
Water content on the document? That affects your concentration math.
redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
Water content on the document? That affects your concentration math.
redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details
area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters
What is the method line say? Not the technique, the actual method.
Metadata check caught a COA that was created in a browser four months after the analysis date. Not evidence of fraud, but worth flagging to Homopeptide.
- 1Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 6–5.…13 comments in this branch · started by u/laila_yilmaz
- 2purity and net content are two different numbers, same vial7 comments in this branch · started by u/liv_nkemelu