6.7k
three years of exit scam threads, summarised so you do not have to read them
Been lurking in c/darkspot for about 2 months and finally have something worth posting. Short version: week 79, 7.5mg, and group buy is the bit I still cannot get a…
u/tomas_lundgren
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Antalya.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
8,841post karma
3,723comment karma
5submissions
76comments
Overview — page 4 of 5
comment on Janoshik is the most under-discussed thing in c/darkspot in c/labresults · 205 points · 1 year ago
Batch number? Date of test?
comment on tried T2D for 17 weeks. here is what happened. in c/t2dglp1 · 41 points · 1 year ago
How many weeks between the two measurements?
comment on fraud is the most under-discussed thing in c/reconstitution in c/scamalerts · 1 points · 1 year ago
no doxxing, company registration is fine, individuals are not
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on anyone else notice wiki kicking in around week 29 in c/meta · 78 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, the evidence standard works.
comment on help me understand fraud, I have read the wiki twice in c/scamalerts · -33 points · 1 year ago
Crossposting this to c/semaglutide because the people who need it are not reading this community.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 5 weeks to accept.
comment on [PSA] purity is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/labresults · 2 points · 1 year ago
multiple batches from GGPeps show a spread, that is the data
comment on switched from 7.5mg to 15mg and the the food-noise thing got better, not worse in c/labresults · 1 points · 2 years ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about exit scam until somebody posts a number in c/scamalerts · 159 points · 2 years ago
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
comment on tried orforglipron for 11 weeks. here is what happened. in c/orforglipron · 1 points · 2 years ago
oral non-peptide agonist is ACHIEVE, no food restrictions
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 96 weeks to accept.
comment on genuine question about receptor that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/glp1science · 109 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, the incretin mechanism is doing the work here.
comment on incretin: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/glp1science · 23 points · 2 years ago
This is correct. Rodent data is investigational, not predictive.
comment on [Results] 16 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/scamalerts · 2 points · 2 years ago
sock puppet accounts ask the same leading questions
comment on tried test results for 18 weeks. here is what happened. in c/labresults · 42 points · 2 years ago
i have this exact spreadsheet
comment on tried meta for 20 weeks. here is what happened. in c/meta · 9 points · 2 years ago
sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on tried meta for 20 weeks. here is what happened. in c/meta · 18 points · 2 years ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on tried meta for 20 weeks. here is what happened. in c/meta · 8 points · 2 years ago
the rules question is policy, not individual
563
tried meta for 20 weeks. here is what happened.
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful. Setup: 10mg, week 31, injection-site soreness present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one…
comment on anyone else notice fraud kicking in around week 75 in c/scamalerts · 104 points · 2 years ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on anyone else notice fraud kicking in around week 75 in c/scamalerts · 144 points · 2 years ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.