Right, the appetite return question again, but with numbers this time. I have 23 data points over 36 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is…
u/valeria_girard
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Mysuru.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
Overview — page 2 of 3
comment on nobody warned me about nausea and I would have liked the warning in c/coa · 116 points · 5 months ago
Four months on the site and I was confusing area% and mass% in every post I made. One explainer thread and it clicked.
comment on New Zealand is the most under-discussed thing in c/glp1science in c/glp1aus · 7 points · 6 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 15 weeks, not 20. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about purity in c/coa · -3 points · 6 months ago
post the whole document, not the headline number
comment on is it normal to get the food-noise thing at week 75 in c/glp1aus · 25 points · 6 months ago
TGA shortage notices are temporary
comment on [Results] 46 weeks on 10mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/labresults · 19 points · 7 months ago
Not to be pedantic but purity and Medutest are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on the COA thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/coa · 17 points · 7 months ago
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
comment on [Discussion] the related substances advice in here is 9 years out of date in c/coa · 134 points · 9 months ago
redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details
comment on is it normal to get reflux at week 50 in c/labresults · 92 points · 9 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on week 81 check-in — 27kg down, sulphur burps manageable, one thing confusing me in c/glp1aus · 41 points · 9 months ago
comment on tried Medutest for 15 weeks. here is what happened. in c/labresults · -35 points · 9 months ago
Yeah, the Janoshik number matching the claim is the actual signal.
Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.
comment on does area percent actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/coa · 10 points · 10 months ago
Strongly agree.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on does area percent actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/coa · 30 points · 10 months ago
Four months on the site and I was confusing area% and mass% in every post I made. One explainer thread and it clicked.
comment on [Results] 71 weeks on 10mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/tapering · 154 points · 10 months ago
STEP 1 and SURMOUNT-4 discontinuation arms show regain
comment on test results: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/labresults · -22 points · 11 months ago
comment on genuine question about tapering that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/tapering · -32 points · 11 months ago
say how long you were on and at what dose before taper
comment on my A1c moved and I cannot work out whether interval stretching is why in c/tapering · 5 points · 1 year ago
That is net peptide content, not purity.
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [PSA] COA is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/coa · 502 points · 1 year ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on my A1c moved and I cannot work out whether interval stretching is why in c/tapering · 58 points · 1 year ago
My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.
comment on my A1c moved and I cannot work out whether interval stretching is why in c/tapering · 72 points · 1 year ago
Stalled for 12 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 86.