u/wrong_network_w
Sent USDC on the wrong chain once. Once was enough. Test with $5 first.
member · joined 2 Mar 2024
comment on [Warning] wrong network. $180 gone. test with $5 first. in c/cryptopay · 187 points · 3 days ago
"out loud" sounds ridiculous and i am going to start doing it.
comment on [Lab] sequence check before price check. every time. in c/researchpeptides · 2 points · 4 days ago
This is correct. Name it precisely.
comment on [PSA] severe abdominal pain is not a forum question in c/sideeffects · 61 points · 5 days ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on [Explainer] evidence levels: in vitro, rodent, human. say which one you mean. in c/researchpeptides · 5 points · 5 days ago
Yeah, identity is the first question.
comment on [PSA] the "send it again and we will refund the first" message is always a scam in c/scamalerts · 132 points · 6 days ago
the genuine version of this problem is the wrong network, and that one is your fault and it is unrecoverable. which is precisely why the scam works — there is a real failure mode adjacent to it.
comment on PDF producer string says the file was made in a browser. is that normal in c/coa · 7 points · 18 days ago
Batch number and date of analysis? Both are load-bearing.
comment on nobody warned me about muscle cramps and I would have liked the warning in c/sideeffects · 9 points · 27 days ago
Strongly agree. Describe your dose, your week number, and your titration speed or nobody can help.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about batch in c/coa · 54 points · 1 months ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on anyone else notice gallbladder kicking in around week 39 in c/sideeffects · 1 points · 1 months ago
sulphur burps are disgusting but not dangerous, 13 weeks and they stopped
comment on my A1c moved and I cannot work out whether identity is why in c/researchpeptides · 7 points · 1 months ago
Has anyone actually got this in writing, or is it forum lore at this point?
comment on France: nausea, and what it actually costs here in c/sideeffects · 6 points · 1 months ago
Not convinced.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 60 weeks to accept.
comment on France: nausea, and what it actually costs here in c/sideeffects · 69 points · 1 months ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Meta] the hair loss rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/sideeffects · 48 points · 1 months ago
sulphur burps are disgusting but not dangerous, 7 weeks and they stopped
comment on reading area percent threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/coa · 276 points · 2 months ago
This is the correct framing.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on Denmark: co-agonism, and what it actually costs here in c/cagrilintide · 1 points · 2 months ago
the co-agonism question is real and interesting
comment on Denmark: co-agonism, and what it actually costs here in c/cagrilintide · 1 points · 2 months ago
Rodent or human data?
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about heart rate in c/sideeffects · 0 points · 2 months ago
hair loss is real and usually reversible when you stabilize
comment on week 91 check-in — 17kg down, fatigue manageable, one thing confusing me in c/coa · 45 points · 3 months ago
chromatogram or it did not happen
comment on [Results] 21 weeks on 1.0mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/cagrilintide · 0 points · 3 months ago
not approved anywhere, keep posts descriptive, not instructional
comment on COA: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/coa · 1 points · 4 months ago
area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters