week 91 check-in — 17kg down, fatigue manageable, one thing confusing me
Quick one. Canada here.
certificate of analysis works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US.
Specifics: the route I used took 15 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the cost. The thing that would have saved me the most time was knowing which document to ask for at the start.
Happy to answer questions from anyone in the same jurisdiction.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Metadata check caught a COA that was created in a browser four months after the analysis date. Not evidence of fraud, but worth flagging to KP.
Did they give you the chromatogram or just the summary line?
the batch number or it did not happen
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
the batch number or it did not happen
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
Sent one vial to PeptideMeter and VendorInvestigate. 97.9% and 97.2%. Cost me more than the vial did and I would do it again.
The COA I was holding said 96.8% area and I thought it was trash. Turns out the method was solid and the impurity profile was clean.
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
- 1the batch number or it did not happen5 comments in this branch · started by u/soren_nkemelu