u/yusuf_ramos
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Basel.
member · joined 12 Mar 2025
Comments — page 5 of 5
comment on [Lab] SSA BPC — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 98.3% in c/glp1science · 4 points · 1 year ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on dose escalation: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/retatrutide · 3 points · 1 year ago
Dose escalation on retatrutide is steeper and faster than on semaglutide. Do not assume the titration patterns transfer.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #2 — France, 33 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/tirzepatide · 90 points · 1 year ago
Hard agree. The food noise disappears differently on the two compounds.
comment on dose escalation: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/retatrutide · 24 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.
comment on [Lab] SSA orfo — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 98.3% in c/darkspot · 66 points · 1 year ago
failures, regrets, things that went wrong
comment on the regret thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/darkspot · 20 points · 1 year ago
tests that came back 95.1%
comment on [Results] 32 weeks, 31kg, and pharmacology was the hard part in c/glp1science · 12 points · 1 year ago
Mechanistically the bit that matters is gastric emptying.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on switched from 12.5mg to 0.5mg and the reflux got better, not worse in c/glp1uk · 154 points · 1 year ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with UK, not with what you concluded.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about regret in c/darkspot · 101 points · 1 year ago
Second this question. I have wondered about lost money for 16 months and never seen a straight answer.
comment on [Question] GIP — what am I missing here in c/tirzepatide · 51 points · 1 year ago
Cosigning. The GIP contribution is real and the side effects are not simply scaled versions.
comment on [Vendor] QST order #2 — Spain, 31 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/retatrutide · 53 points · 1 year ago
Are you quoting phase 2 or is there phase 3 data now?
comment on am I the only one who found Mounjaro harder than the injections in c/tirzepatide · 250 points · 2 years ago
do not crack the pen, we have been over this
comment on gastric emptying — my 18-week log, condensed into one table in c/glp1science · 199 points · 2 years ago
Strongly agree. Central appetite is real but people overstate it.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #17 — the Netherlands, 9 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/glp1uk · 210 points · 2 years ago
Crossposting this to c/sideeffects because the people who need it are not reading this community.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about private prescription in c/glp1uk · 77 points · 2 years ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on genuine question about receptor that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/glp1science · 55 points · 2 years ago
do not extrapolate rodent data to human dosing without saying so
comment on [Discussion] dual agonist is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/tirzepatide · 1 points · 2 years ago
Strongly agree. Tirz is better than sema is not a claim without a comparator dose.
comment on [Discussion] dual agonist is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/tirzepatide · 119 points · 2 years ago
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
comment on France: tirzepatide, and what it actually costs here in c/tirzepatide · 319 points · 2 years ago
The dual agonism story is real. The appetite is physically different from semaglutide alone.
comment on France: tirzepatide, and what it actually costs here in c/tirzepatide · 550 points · 2 years ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.