u/zaid_eriksen
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Beirut.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
Comments — page 4 of 4
comment on why does nobody talk about regulatory in c/bpc157 · 13 points · 1 year ago
the regulatory literature looks promising but rodent-only
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for long term posts in c/maintenancephase · 59 points · 2 years ago
nobody posts about this part and it is the longest part
comment on week 71 check-in — 7kg down, reflux manageable, one thing confusing me in c/bpc157 · 15 points · 2 years ago
appreciate you saying you do not know
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on reship vs Medutest — genuinely asking which matters more in c/vendorvetting · 156 points · 2 years ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on Apotheke is the most under-discussed thing in c/coa in c/glp1eu · 396 points · 2 years ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on regain — my 8-week log, condensed into one table in c/maintenancephase · 1 points · 2 years ago
the maintenance question changes at maintenance
comment on three years of pentadecapeptide threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/bpc157 · 18 points · 2 years ago
research use only, no human protocols, no injection instructions
comment on [Question] Sweden — has anyone got a straight answer on pentadecapeptide in c/bpc157 · 1 points · 2 years ago
regulatory status changed in 16 countries, check yours
comment on reading fraud threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/scamalerts · 927 points · 2 years ago
Did WWB respond or ghost you?
comment on [Discussion] fraud is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/scamalerts · 6 points · 2 years ago
the batch number appearing across three vendors is a red flag
comment on [Discussion] fraud is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/scamalerts · 45 points · 2 years ago
Batch 12 appeared on QSC, Homopeptide, and QSC claims it is raw material origin. Could be fine, could be reseller. Logged it in the directory.
comment on my triglycerides moved and I cannot work out whether fraud is why in c/scamalerts · 427 points · 2 years ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with fraud, not with what you concluded.
comment on my ALT moved and I cannot work out whether Janoshik is why in c/vendorvetting · 9 points · 2 years ago
The Janoshik and Medutest numbers on the same vial from KP came back 98.9% and 99.0%. Both are right, inter-lab variance is real.
comment on my ALT moved and I cannot work out whether Janoshik is why in c/vendorvetting · -9 points · 2 years ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on my ALT moved and I cannot work out whether Janoshik is why in c/vendorvetting · 16 points · 2 years ago
Reship experience: SGN asked for photos, processed it in 21 days, sent a replacement no questions. That is the template.
comment on week 86 check-in — 31kg down, muscle cramps manageable, one thing confusing me in c/vendorvetting · 2 points · 2 years ago
The Janoshik and Medutest numbers on the same vial from SGN came back 97.4% and 97.2%. Both are right, inter-lab variance is real.