my triglycerides moved and I cannot work out whether fraud is why
Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud.
The advice on scam in this community changed substantially around the start of last year, and nobody went back and updated the older posts. So depending on which thread the search engine hands you, you get two contradictory answers with the same confidence.
I have listed what I think the current consensus is below. Correct me — that is the point of posting it.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with fraud, not with what you concluded.
the batch number appearing across three vendors is a red flag
fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.
Can you post the Medutest result that shows the problem?
reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations
reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations
Disagree on that part. 99.2% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
Can you post the Janoshik result that shows the problem?
the batch number appearing across three vendors is a red flag
PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page. Worth flagging.
a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so
a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
the HJ situation resolved, logged it here as resolved
cloned storefronts use old images, search for those
Slight fix: the number was 99.1, not 93.7. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
the batch number appearing across three vendors is a red flag
the batch number appearing across three vendors is a red flag
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 30 weeks to accept.
PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page. Worth flagging.
Batch 10 appeared on HJ, KP, and HJ claims it is raw material origin. Could be fine, could be reseller. Logged it in the directory.
evidence required, dated screenshots, metadata, order records, or independent test
reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations
group buy exit scams follow a pattern
Dated screenshot or is this from memory?
the batch number appearing across three vendors is a red flag
Dated screenshot or is this from memory?
cloned storefronts use old images, search for those
- 1Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.16 comments in this branch · started by u/aleksi_marchand
- 2PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the…5 comments in this branch · started by u/tuva_aalto