my triglycerides moved and I cannot work out whether fraud is why
Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud. The advice on scam in this community changed substantially around the start of last year, and nobody went back and updated the older posts. So depending on which thread the search engine hands you, you get two contradictory answers with the…
Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.
Can you post the Medutest result that shows the problem?
reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations
reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations
Disagree on that part. 99.2% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
Can you post the Janoshik result that shows the problem?
the batch number appearing across three vendors is a red flag
PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page. Worth flagging.
a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so
a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
the HJ situation resolved, logged it here as resolved
cloned storefronts use old images, search for those
Slight fix: the number was 99.1, not 93.7. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
the batch number appearing across three vendors is a red flag
the batch number appearing across three vendors is a red flag
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 30 weeks to accept.