1.4k
USDC — my 23-week log, condensed into one table
Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/darkspot repeats that confirmations is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I…
u/zeynep_villalobos
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Poznań.
member · joined 18 Sep 2025
6,427post karma
7,488comment karma
3submissions
85comments
Overview — page 4 of 5
comment on milestone: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/progresspics · 16 points · 1 year ago
Maintenance for 5 months now. Weight moves within about 3kg and the dose is a quarter of what it peaked at.
comment on tried USDC for 5 weeks. here is what happened. in c/cryptopay · 54 points · 1 year ago
Small correction: the trial was 8 weeks, not 38. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on [Question] Medutest — what am I missing here in c/vendorvetting · 538 points · 1 year ago
SGN order #3, the UK, no drama, receipts inside
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on someone explain goal to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/progresspics · 2 points · 1 year ago
the milestone change matters as much as the scale
Disagree on that part. 99.2% and 99.0% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify hepatic fat in c/survodutide · 33 points · 1 year ago
hepatic fat and biopsy are the story
comment on [Results] 76 weeks on 2.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/glp1science · 785 points · 1 year ago
Receptor distribution explains why constipation hits appetite but not half-life.
comment on help me understand appetite return, I have read the wiki twice in c/tapering · 100 points · 1 year ago
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
comment on [Discussion] the receptor advice in here is 4 years out of date in c/glp1science · 35 points · 1 year ago
Receptor distribution explains why constipation hits mechanism but not mechanism.
2.8k
[Discussion] the receptor advice in here is 4 years out of date
I have had 17 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe. Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied…
comment on goal — my 13-week log, condensed into one table in c/progresspics · 53 points · 2 years ago
text only is the whole point of the community
comment on what changed for me between week 95 and week 43 in c/glp1science · 79 points · 2 years ago
the half-life is half-life, affects steady state timing
comment on switched from 1.0mg to 0.5mg and the reflux got better, not worse in c/vendorvetting · 200 points · 2 years ago
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for vendor posts in c/vendorvetting · 263 points · 2 years ago
the VendorInvestigate result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
comment on genuine question about receptor that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/glp1science · 14 points · 2 years ago
[removed by moderator]
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on small win: testing stopped being a problem at week 65 in c/vendorvetting · 423 points · 2 years ago
the batch number or it did not happen
comment on tried network for 23 weeks. here is what happened. in c/cryptopay · 4 points · 2 years ago
confirmations are chargeback, the exchange rate at 3 blocks is the deal
comment on tried network for 23 weeks. here is what happened. in c/cryptopay · 37 points · 2 years ago
no price talk, no tickers, no investment discussion
comment on my ferritin moved and I cannot work out whether appetite is why in c/glp1science · 13 points · 2 years ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on [Lab] 21th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/glp1science · 471 points · 2 years ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
Adding to this: mechanism is doing more work than the comment implies.