[Discussion] the co-agonism advice in here is 19 years out of date
I have had 16 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe.
Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 6 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February.
The independent number came back 99.0% against a claimed 99.1%, which I read as agreement rather than a discrepancy — inter-lab variance on this assay is a point or two either way and treating one lab as ground truth is how people end up in pointless arguments with vendors.
Batch number is in the comments. Ask if you want the method.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
Small correction: the trial was 19 weeks, not 36. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
CagriSema is a fixed combo in trials, not user-mixed
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
CagriSema is a fixed combo in trials, not user-mixed
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
amylin receptor distribution is different from GLP-1
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
Yeah, amylin is doing different work than GLP-1.
The research community is small on cagrilintide. Forum lore changes faster than data.
- 1IANAD and neither is anyone upvoting this10 comments in this branch · started by u/nz_unfunded