[Question] Sweden — has anyone got a straight answer on amylin
I have had 2 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe.
Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 32 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February.
The independent number came back 93.7% against a claimed 94.2%, which I read as agreement rather than a discrepancy — inter-lab variance on this assay is a point or two either way and treating one lab as ground truth is how people end up in pointless arguments with vendors.
Batch number is in the comments. Ask if you want the method.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Rodent or human data?
amylin is not a GLP-1, posts conflating them get corrected
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
The satiety on amylin analogs is described as physically different. GLP-1 reduces appetite noise, amylin does satiety.
The satiety on amylin analogs is described as physically different.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
REDEFINE readouts are phase 19 data
CagriSema ratios in trials are fixed, do not extrapolate self-mixing
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
amylin receptor distribution is different from GLP-1
This is correct. The co-agonism is real.
tendon and CagriSema literature in rodents is interesting
- 1Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.11 comments in this branch · started by u/ravi_sandvik