what would you tell week-1 you about related substances
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: certificate of analysis matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 24 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 21 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Water content was 3.8%, acetate was 6.2%, purity was 99%, but net peptide was only 90% of the label weight. Perfectly honest, just chemistry.
axis labels included, always
the counterion is part of the mass you paid for
post the whole document, not the headline number
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
the related substances line is where the story is
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
- 1Water content was 3.8%, acetate was 6.2%, purity was 99%, but net peptide…5 comments in this branch · started by u/anders_kuusela
- 2more of this energy please4 comments in this branch · started by u/yara_antonsen