does batch actually matter or is it forum lore at this point
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking batch against triglycerides for 17 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here. Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one…
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
Adding to this: certificate of analysis is doing more work than the comment implies.
area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters
the related substances line is where the story is
Are you looking at area% or net peptide content? Different numbers.
the batch number or it did not happen
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.