what would you tell week-1 you about batch
Right, the certificate of analysis question again, but with numbers this time. I have 4 data points over 16 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign. The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect…
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
[removed by moderator]
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
This is the correct framing. The COA structure matters as much as the number.
redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details
Slight fix: the number was 99.3, not 93.7. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
Slight fix: the number was 99.3, not 93.7.
Adding to this: water content is doing more work than the comment implies.
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
What is the method line say? Not the technique, the actual method.
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.