water content — 5 things I got wrong before I got it right
Confession thread, sort of. I went from 0.25mg to 10mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 13 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway. So now I have early…
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
Small correction: the trial was 20 weeks, not 7. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
the related substances line is where the story is
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
the batch number or it did not happen
redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details
area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters
Water content on the document? That affects your concentration math.
purity and net content are two different numbers, same vial
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
Did they give you the chromatogram or just the summary line?
area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters
the method line is doing real work, not just window dressing