Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] we are measuring purity at the wrong time and calling it noise — 20 comments in the full submission. View in context.
506
[Discussion] we are measuring purity at the wrong time and calling it noise
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: certificate of analysis matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 15 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 25 people…
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
[removed]5 points·3 months ago
[removed by moderator]
no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are
Strongly agree. Mass% and area% are answering different questions on the same document.
post the whole document, not the headline number
post the whole document, not the headline number
Adding to this: related substances is doing more work than the comment implies.