[Discussion] we are measuring area percent at the wrong time and calling it noise
area percent. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/sideeffects is downstream of it. Titration speed, muscle cramps, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort area percent out first, and almost nobody does. I say this having got it wrong for 24…
the batch number or it did not happen
Are you looking at area% or net peptide content? Different numbers.
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
Asked TFC for the batch-specific COA and they sent it within six hours, full document, batch number, date, everything. That is the baseline.
Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
Sceptical.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
post the whole document, not the headline number