my TSH moved and I cannot work out whether area percent is why
Quick one. Canada here.
certificate of analysis works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US.
Specifics: the route I used took 8 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the cost. The thing that would have saved me the most time was knowing which document to ask for at the start.
Happy to answer questions from anyone in the same jurisdiction.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
post the whole document, not the headline number
Not to be pedantic but batch and batch are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details
no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are
no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are
Adding to this: COA is doing more work than the comment implies.
the related substances line is where the story is
Water content was 3.8%, acetate was 6.2%, purity was 99%, but net peptide was only 90% of the label weight. Perfectly honest, just chemistry.
the counterion is part of the mass you paid for
What is the method line say? Not the technique, the actual method.
the related substances line is where the story is
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
Strongly agree. Mass% and area% are answering different questions on the same document.
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
Not to be pedantic but batch and purity are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
the counterion is part of the mass you paid for
[deleted]
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
[deleted]
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are
no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are
Adding to this: purity is doing more work than the comment implies.
- 1This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three…8 comments in this branch · started by u/halima_boateng
- 2Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the…6 comments in this branch · started by u/step_therapy_s