GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of what changed for me between week 20 and week 63 — 57 comments in the full submission. View in context.
2k
c/compounding·submitted 6 months ago by u/medutest_mel

what changed for me between week 20 and week 63

Questionbranch of 7 comments

Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud. The advice on 503B in this community changed substantially around the start of last year, and nobody went back and updated the older posts. So depending on which thread the search engine hands you, you get two contradictory answers with the…

Read the full submission and all 57 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 6 months ago
u/hugo_bergstrom60 points·6 months ago

Crossposting this to c/t2dglp1 because the people who need it are not reading this community.

replysharereportpermalink
u/burned_once_twice18 points·6 months ago

regulatory claims need a citation to the actual rule, not interpretation

replysharereportpermalink
u/emil_okwuosa32 points·6 months ago

What is the actual shortage list status right now?

replysharereportpermalink
u/medutest_melOP25 points·6 months ago

API transparency is the question that separates good compounders from sketchy ones

replysharereportpermalink
u/clara_danquah8 points·6 months ago

Strongly agree. API source transparency matters.

replysharereportpermalink
u/escrow_evangelist6 points·6 months ago

telehealth costs 503B plus compounding markup, total varies

replysharereportpermalink
u/hugo_bergstrom4 points·6 months ago

telehealth costs 503B plus compounding markup, total varies

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 4 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/compounding

Compounded GLP-1s as a supply route: the 503A/503B distinction, the shortage-list mechanics that made compounding legal and then didn't, state board rules, telehealth prescriber models, and what a compounding pharmacy will and will not tell you about its API source.

53kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/compounding
c/compounding rules
  1. Regulatory claims need a citation to the actual rule, notice or docket.
  2. No pharmacy referral codes. Naming a pharmacy is fine; recruiting for it is not.
  3. API source questions are on-topic and pharmacies dodging them is newsworthy.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/formulary_fighteru/usp_appendixu/quiet_moderatoru/prior_auth_pain
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →