[Discussion] can we stop arguing about mechanism until somebody posts a number
I have had 3 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe. Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 22 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February. The independent number came back 97.9% against a claimed…
rodent receptor tells you what to investigate, not what to expect in humans
incretin physiology is mechanism, the mechanism layer
This is correct. Rodent data is investigational, not predictive.
Strongly agree. Central appetite is real but people overstate it.
Strongly agree.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
glucagon-receptor contribution is gastric emptying for dual and triple agonism
Which paper are you quoting?
Which paper are you quoting?
Adding to this: gastric emptying is doing more work than the comment implies.
amylin is not GLP-1, posts conflating them get corrected
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
cite the paper: journal, year, first author, links optional
Strongly agree. Central appetite is real but people overstate it.
Where does the half-life data actually come from?