week 86 check-in — 26kg down, fatigue manageable, one thing confusing me
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: cycle matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 20 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 15 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Sweden here. Waited 10 months on a list, gave up, went private, and the total cost was roughly what I expected.
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
Strongly agree. Cycle changes are documented.
hair-loss on cycle is real
perimenopause and menopause weight physiology
[deleted]
cycle changes are real and under-researched
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
contraception interaction claims need citation
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
the trials mostly studied men, insulin resistance skipped
the trials mostly studied men, perimenopause skipped
no cycle-tracking data with identifying details
I am going to push back on this slightly.
no cycle-tracking data with identifying details
What are you comparing it against though?
- 1Sweden here. Waited 10 months on a list, gave up, went private, and the…12 comments in this branch · started by u/dose_creep_dan
- 2no cycle-tracking data with identifying details5 comments in this branch · started by u/valeria_cardoso