[Vendor] QST order #4 — Denmark, 37 days, no drama, receipts inside
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: moderation matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 16 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 25 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
the site talking about itself
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
Slight fix: the number was 99.0, not 98.9. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
Not to be pedantic but meta and disclosure are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
moderation appeals go through modmail first
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
Disagree on that part. 97.9% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
- 1the site talking about itself8 comments in this branch · started by u/blunt_coldbox29