GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
0
c/meta·posted 10 months ago by u/RetaAndRegret2

the wiki question that gets asked weekly, answered properly

Rules

Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.

Setup: 1.7mg, week 17, sulphur burps present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — ranking — and tracked it for 12 weeks.

Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.

Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.

0 up / 0 down47% upvoted8 commentsid 18mrrj28 Sep 2025

8 comments

8 in this archive, depth 3

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/hub_opssite staff3 points·10 months ago

the site talking about itself

replysharereportpermalink
u/andres_dahlberg1 point·10 months ago

This is correct. Modmail first.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_ndiaye-30 points·10 months ago

This is correct.

Adding to this: ranking is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]1 point·10 months ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/naomi_erdogan1 point·10 months ago

Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kenji_vasquez2 points·10 months ago

rules, moderation, ranking, wiki

replysharereportpermalink
u/tomas_lundgren0 points·10 months ago

Strongly agree. Transparency wins.

replysharereportpermalink
u/vikram_mbeki1 point·10 months ago

Yeah, the evidence standard works.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →