GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] the archive-after-a-year policy: keep, change, or scrap — 15 comments in the full submission. View in context.
69
c/meta·submitted 1 months ago by u/stablecoin_steve

[Discussion] the archive-after-a-year policy: keep, change, or scrap

Discussionbranch of 4 comments

Right, the rules question again, but with numbers this time. I have 12 data points over 36 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign. The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing…

Read the full submission and all 15 comments →

This branch

4 comments, started 1 months ago
u/marta_trevino4 points·1 months ago

This is correct. Modmail first.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nora_lundgren3 points·1 months ago

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

replysharereportpermalink
u/placebo_arm_pam2 points·1 months ago

the ranking formula is meta

replysharereportpermalink
u/dose_creep_dan2 points·1 months ago

the wiki is the source

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.