[Discussion] we are measuring wiki at the wrong time and calling it noise
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.
Setup: 2.4mg, week 52, injection-site soreness present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — ranking — and tracked it for 16 weeks.
Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.
Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Stalled for 15 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 44.
[deleted]
Small correction: the trial was 12 weeks, not 16. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
Stalled for 12 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 78.
sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly
sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 26 weeks to accept.
rule-change proposals need concrete wording
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
- 1Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual…6 comments in this branch · started by u/discount_math_dm
- 2Stalled for 15 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 44.4 comments in this branch · started by u/scam_taxonomy