GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of unpopular opinion: moderation is massively overrated — 19 comments in the full submission. View in context.
128
c/meta·submitted 6 months ago by u/rina_ferreira

unpopular opinion: moderation is massively overrated

Rulesbranch of 10 comments

Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: moderation matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 9 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 39 people measuring the same…

Read the full submission and all 19 comments →

This branch

10 comments, started 6 months ago
u/enzo_fonseca8 points·6 months ago

Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hub_opsMOD4 points·6 months ago

Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rina_ferreiraOP2 points·6 months ago

Week 72 for me and the honest summary is: 23kg down, nausea manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_petrescu4 points·6 months ago

This is correct. Modmail first.

replysharereportpermalink
u/scam_taxonomyc/scamalerts1 point·6 months ago

Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.

replysharereportpermalink
u/salma_almeida1 point·6 months ago

the site talking about itself

replysharereportpermalink
u/discount_math_dm3 points·6 months ago

This is correct. Modmail first.

replysharereportpermalink
u/arto_fonseca1 point·6 months ago

You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.

replysharereportpermalink
u/joaquin_ivaturi-31 points·6 months ago

moderation appeals go through modmail first

replysharereportpermalink
u/joaquin_wojcik1 point·6 months ago

the moderation decision is logged

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →