GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of someone explain moderation to me like I have not read a paper in years — 21 comments in the full submission. View in context.
323
c/meta·submitted 1 year ago by u/ahmed_cardoso

someone explain moderation to me like I have not read a paper in years

Rulesbranch of 6 comments

Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: moderation matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 13 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 15 people measuring the…

Read the full submission and all 21 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 1 year ago
u/rekha_mwangi32 points·1 year ago

Did anything else change in the same window?

replysharereportpermalink
u/fatima_wojcik9 points·1 year ago

This is correct. Modmail first.

replysharereportpermalink
u/emil_wojcik5 points·1 year ago

Second this question. I have wondered about moderation for 18 months and never seen a straight answer.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dilara_nyberg3 points·1 year ago

moderation appeals go through modmail first

replysharereportpermalink
u/kenji_vasquez2 points·1 year ago·edited

the moderation decision is logged

replysharereportpermalink
u/divya_bakken8 points·1 year ago

rules, moderation, ranking, wiki

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.