someone explain moderation to me like I have not read a paper in years
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: moderation matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 13 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 15 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
Maintenance for 24 months now. Weight moves within about 3kg and the dose is a quarter of what it peaked at.
the evidence standards are rules
What are you comparing it against though?
Did anything else change in the same window?
This is correct. Modmail first.
Second this question. I have wondered about moderation for 18 months and never seen a straight answer.
moderation appeals go through modmail first
the periodic argument about moderation standards
the wiki is the source
How many weeks between the two measurements?
the periodic argument about disclosure standards
the periodic argument about moderation standards
sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly
the periodic argument about moderation standards
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 11 weeks to accept.
- 1the periodic argument about moderation standards8 comments in this branch · started by u/rina_ferreira
- 2Did anything else change in the same window?6 comments in this branch · started by u/rekha_mwangi