GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of ranking: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 — 68 comments in the full submission. View in context.
2.9k
c/meta·submitted 2 years ago by u/rekha_mwangi

ranking: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1

Appealbranch of 11 comments

Confession thread, sort of. I went from 1.0mg to 15mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 22 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway. So now I have muscle…

Read the full submission and all 68 comments →

This branch

11 comments, started 2 years ago
u/zeynep_duarte91 points·2 years ago

Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rosa_almeida27 points·2 years ago·edited

Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dexa_twice_yearlybody comp14 points·2 years ago

the wiki is the source

replysharereportpermalink
u/dizzy_on_standing8 points·2 years ago

the 6 month rule change is in effect

replysharereportpermalink
u/dexa_twice_yearlybody comp3 points·2 years ago

moderation appeals go through modmail first

replysharereportpermalink
u/emil_wojcik17 points·2 years ago·edited

rule-change proposals need concrete wording

replysharereportpermalink
u/rekha_mwangiOP7 points·2 years ago

This is correct. Modmail first.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_varga25 points·2 years ago

moderation appeals go through modmail first

replysharereportpermalink
u/emil_marchand9 points·2 years ago

the evidence standards are disclosure

replysharereportpermalink
u/rekha_mwangiOP10 points·2 years ago

the site talking about itself

replysharereportpermalink
u/dilara_nyberg21 points·2 years ago

the 11 month rule change is in effect

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →