GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Announcement] sponsor disclosure, in full, again, because someone asked — 12 comments in the full submission. View in context.
39
c/meta·submitted 13 days ago by u/joaquin_wojcik

[Announcement] sponsor disclosure, in full, again, because someone asked

Announcementbranch of 8 comments

Confession thread, sort of. I went from 0.25mg to 10mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 4 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway. So now I have sulphur…

Read the full submission and all 12 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 12 days ago
u/blunt_coldbox2910 points·12 days ago

Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_varga3 points·12 days ago

rule-change proposals need concrete wording

replysharereportpermalink
u/yannick_petrov3 points·11 days ago

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

replysharereportpermalink
u/cloudy_vial_carol3 points·11 days ago

rules, moderation, ranking, wiki

replysharereportpermalink
u/kaia_fonseca5 points·11 days ago·edited

I am going to push back on this slightly.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hedda_aguirre8 points·11 days ago

moderation appeals go through modmail first

replysharereportpermalink
u/joaquin_wojcikOP5 points·11 days ago·edited

moderation appeals go through modmail first

Disagree on that part. 93.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/marta_trevino3 points·11 days ago

sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →