[Discussion] we are measuring small molecule at the wrong time and calling it noise
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: small molecule matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 7 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 37 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Yeah, small molecule changes the whole game.
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
small molecule purity is different testing than peptides
This is correct. ATTAIN data is phase 13.
My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.
the sulphur burps profile is speculative at this stage
Yeah, small molecule changes the whole game.
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.
phase 6 data is interesting, phase 14 will tell the real story
phase 16 data is interesting, phase 27 will tell the real story
What was the batch number and which service?
Second this question. I have wondered about small molecule for 3 months and never seen a straight answer.
Yeah, small molecule changes the whole game.
- 1Yeah, small molecule changes the whole game.5 comments in this branch · started by u/dario_boateng
- 2Yeah, small molecule changes the whole game.4 comments in this branch · started by u/declared_value_dv